← Back
Rewards3 min read21 October 2026

Checking Pay Fairness: A Practical Internal Equity Review

How to run an internal pay equity review: grouping comparable roles, finding unexplained gaps, testing the reasons and fixing what you find.

Most organisations believe their pay is fair. Few have checked. An internal equity review tests that belief, looking at whether people doing comparable work are paid consistently, and whether any differences have a reason the organisation would be comfortable explaining.

UAE labour law requires equal pay for women and men doing the same work or work of equal value, which gives the exercise a legal dimension as well as a practical one. But the stronger reason to do it is trust. Unexplained gaps tend to surface eventually, and they do more damage when someone else finds them first.

What an equity review looks at

An equity review compares pay within groups of genuinely comparable roles, usually the same grade and job family. It asks whether differences can be explained by legitimate factors such as:

  • performance and contribution
  • relevant experience and skills
  • time in role or recent promotion
  • a documented market premium for scarce skills
  • location or entity, where pay policy differs

What remains after those factors are taken into account is the gap that needs attention.

Five steps

1. Build the comparison groups

Group employees by grade and job family. This step depends on a sound grading structure. If similar roles sit in different grades, fix that first, or the analysis will not mean much.

2. Gather consistent pay data

Use the same pay definition for everyone, usually total fixed pay, and look separately at bonus outcomes. Include the factors you will test, such as performance ratings, hire date and promotion history.

3. Look for patterns

Compare pay within each group against characteristics that should not influence it, including gender and nationality. Look at compa-ratios, bonus outcomes and promotion rates, not just salaries.

SignalWhat it may indicate
One group consistently lower in rangeStarting salaries set differently, or slower progression
Bonus outcomes differ for similar ratingsInconsistent manager discretion
Promotion rates differBarriers in how potential is assessed
Large spread with no clear driverPay set by negotiation rather than policy

4. Test the explanations

For each gap, ask whether a documented, legitimate reason explains it. If the only explanation is "that is what they asked for when they joined", it is not a reason the organisation would want to defend.

5. Act and record

Correct unexplained gaps, usually over one or two review cycles, and fix the process that caused them: offer approval rules, consistent starting points in the range, calibrated bonus decisions. Record what was found and what was done.

Keeping it confidential

Equity reviews involve sensitive personal data. Limit access to a small group, report results in aggregate wherever groups are large enough, and agree in advance how findings will be shared with leadership.

How often

A full review every two to three years, with a lighter check during each salary review, is enough for most organisations. A review is also worth doing after a merger, a restructure or a period of fast hiring.

How Humatix can help

Humatix carries out internal pay equity reviews for UAE and GCC employers, from grading checks and data analysis through to practical recommendations for correcting gaps and preventing new ones.

Note: legal or tax advice should be sought on the legal and tax matters referred to in this article, as requirements vary by jurisdiction and change over time.